Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt's avatar

Fantastic stuff, huge thank you for the free contribution to bettering humanity. I would like to raise a slight concern though.

I read the article linked, it doesn't seem to tally with your statement.

"And in one of the earliest examples of a general-purpose robot protecting a human, a Waymo in San Francisco shielded passenger Doug Fulop from an attacker who punched the windows, tried to lift the vehicle, and screamed he wanted to kill Fulop for “giving money to a robot.” The machines are already choosing our side."

There was no general purpose robot protecting a human, no exercising of ethics / trolley problems. There was simply an automated vehicle that was disabled? Clarity, transparency and accountability are incredibly important. I hope I've somehow misunderstood.

Thank you again.

Plasticity on Fire's avatar

Plasticity / systems lens

What you’re describing is synchronized plasticity across geopolitical and economic systems. Recursive models are just the catalyst; the deeper shift is that feedback cycles—prediction, decision, execution—are collapsing into tighter loops. Once management itself becomes plastic, institutions start to behave like learning systems under continuous selective pressure. The Pacific framing matters because it creates parallel gradients, not a single center. This won’t converge to a point; it will keep reconfiguring under load. Pressure doesn’t just expose systems. It reorganizes them.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?