Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Citizen1's avatar

Always fresh and always smart. Thanks Doctor

Michael S.'s avatar

As far as the chicks go, Michael Levin would find this entirely unsurprising. For him, the more interesting question is why we ever assumed cross-modal abstraction belonged to language users in the first place. Round objects genuinely produce more continuous, lower-frequency sounds than spiky ones — any sensory system under pressure to predict what it will hear from what it sees will encode that correlation. The chick isn't demonstrating a proto-version of a human capacity. It's demonstrating that this capacity was never at our level to begin with. It was always down in the substrate, which is exactly where Levin has been looking all along. The circle of minds worth taking seriously didn't just expand — it turns out we were never the ones qualified to draw it.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?